Competitive Intelligence-Driven ESG Analytics: A Strategic Framework For ESG Disclosure Intelligence and Sustainable Decision Support
PDF

Keywords

Sustainable Competitive Intelligence
ESG disclosure intelligence
Intelligence cycle
Dynamic capabilities
Strategic decision-making
Sustainable Competitive Advantage
Natural language processing
Chinese listed companies

How to Cite

Yang, T., Heng, T. B., Hui, K. J., & Tao, Z. (2026). Competitive Intelligence-Driven ESG Analytics: A Strategic Framework For ESG Disclosure Intelligence and Sustainable Decision Support. Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence , 16, e0677. https://doi.org/10.37497/eagleSustainable.v16i.677

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to establish and validate a Competitive Intelligence (CI)-driven ESG analytics framework capable of transforming ESG disclosure analysis from a purely computational classification exercise into a strategic intelligence mechanism for sustainable decision-making and competitive advantage.

Methodology/approach: The research adopts a strategic-intelligence approach integrating the Competitive Intelligence cycle, dynamic capabilities perspective, and natural language processing (NLP). Using a publicly available dataset containing 8,471 ESG disclosure sentences from Chinese listed companies, the study applies preprocessing, feature engineering, TF-IDF vectorization, and supervised machine learning models, including logistic regression, complement naïve Bayes, and linear support vector machines. A Competitive Intelligence Score was developed to evaluate disclosure maturity and strategic relevance.

Originality/Relevance: The study contributes by reframing ESG analytics as an organizational intelligence capability embedded within intelligence governance and strategic foresight processes. It introduces a maturity-aware CI framework linking ESG disclosure quality to sustainable competitive intelligence and decision-support systems.

Key findings: The proposed models achieved strong classification performance, with disclosure-quality classification reaching 0.882 accuracy and macro-F1 of 0.799. The Competitive Intelligence Score effectively differentiated quantitative, qualitative, and irrelevant disclosures, revealing significant evidence gaps across ESG pillars and supporting managerial benchmarking and strategic responsiveness.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: The article advances the literature by integrating Competitive Intelligence, dynamic capabilities, ESG intelligence governance, and NLP-based analytics into a unified strategic framework. Methodologically, it operationalizes ESG disclosure maturity through a reproducible intelligence-oriented analytical pipeline.

https://doi.org/10.37497/eagleSustainable.v16i.677
PDF

References

Aldridge, I., & Martin, P. (2022). ESG in corporate filings: An AI perspective. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.00018

An, H., Ran, C., & Gao, Y. (2025). Does ESG information disclosure increase firm value? The mediation role of financing constraints in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 73, 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102584

Calof, J. L. (2025). Synergies between competitive intelligence and foresight: Towards a joint research agenda. Futures, 173, 103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103653

Chen, S., Cheng, M., Luo, Y., & Tsang, A. (2024). ESG performance and analyst recommendations: Evidence from sustainability analysts in the Chinese market. Journal of Accounting Literature. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-04-2024-0063

Chen, W., Yang, K., Yu, Z., Shi, Y., & Chen, C. L. P. (2024). A survey on imbalanced learning: Latest research, applications and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(6), 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10759-6

Cini, F., & Ferrari, A. (2025). Towards the estimation of ESG ratings: A machine learning approach using balance sheet ratios. Research in International Business and Finance, 73(B), 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102653

Dakle, P. P., Gon, A., Zha, S., Wang, L., Rallabandi, S. K., & Raghavan, P. (2024). Jetsons at FinNLP 2024: Towards understanding the ESG impact of a news article using transformer-based models. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop of the 7th Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing, the 5th Knowledge Discovery from Unstructured Data in Financial Services, and the 4th Workshop on Economics and Natural Language Processing (pp. 254–260). https://aclanthology.org/2024.finnlp-1.27/

David, L. K., Wang, J., Angel, V., & Luo, M. (2024). China’s ESG scorecard: A predictive machine learning model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3468–3486. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2746

Davidescu, A. A. M., Manta, E. M., Birlan, I., Miler, A. M., & Nita, A. S. C. (2026). Detecting greenwashing in ESG disclosure: An NLP-based analysis of Central and Eastern European firms. Sustainability, 18(3), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031486

Ding, Y., Tang, X., Yang, Z., Zhang, W., Wu, S., Huang, Y., Lan, L., Li, W., Chen, Y., Ju, M., & Yang, W. (2025). EulerESG: Automating ESG disclosure analysis with LLMs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.21712

Fabijanska, A., Wolczek, P., & Sikacz, H. (2025). Can machine learning bring ESG ratings closer to small and medium-sized enterprises? Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(4), 1615–1663. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3162

Ferjancic, U., Ichev, R., Loncarski, I., Montariol, M., Pelicon, A., Pollak, S., Sitar Sustar, K., Toman, A., Valentincic, A., & Zumer, M. (2024). Textual analysis of corporate sustainability reporting and corporate ESG scores. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103669

Ghallabi, F., Souissi, B., Du, A. M., & Ali, S. (2025). ESG stock markets and clean energy prices prediction: Insights from advanced machine learning. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, 103889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103889

Hao, P., Alharbi, S. S., Hunjra, A. I., & Zhao, S. (2025). How do ESG ratings promote digital technology innovation? International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, 103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103886

Huang, J., Wang, D. D., & Wang, Y. (2024). Textual attributes of corporate sustainability reports and ESG ratings. Sustainability, 16(21), 9270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219270

Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta-analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101668

Lagasio, V. (2024). ESG-washing detection in corporate sustainability reports. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103742

Lee, H., Choi, J., Kwon, S., & Jung, S. (2023). EaSyGuide: ESG issue identification framework leveraging abilities of generative large language models. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing and the Second Multimodal AI for Financial Forecasting (pp. 127–132). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.06662

Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2023). Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122779

Li, Y. (2025). Decoding CSR reports: How report readability and tone influence M&A target and acquirer likelihood. Finance Research Letters, 85, 107917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107917

Liu, Y. (2025). Evaluation of China’s ESG policy texts based on policy instruments, policy themes, and policy subjects. Sustainability, 17(17), 7796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177796

Long, L., Wang, C., & Zhang, M. (2025). Does social media pressure induce corporate hypocrisy? Evidence of ESG greenwashing from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 197(2), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05747-3

Maluleka, M. L., & Chummun, B. Z. (2023). Competitive intelligence and strategy implementation: Critical examination of present literature review. South African Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 1610. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v25i1.1610

Mashayekhi, B., Asiaei, K., Rezaee, Z., Jahangard, A., Samavat, M., & Homayoun, S. (2024). The relative importance of ESG pillars: A two-step machine learning and analytical framework. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5404–5420. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2979

Oehler, A., & Neuss, C. (2025). ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value for investors? International Review of Financial Analysis, 107, 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104623

Ong, K., Mao, R., Varshney, D., Cambria, E., & Mengaldo, G. (2025). Towards robust ESG analysis against greenwashing risks: Aspect-action analysis with cross-category generalization. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15821

Schimanski, T., Reding, A., Reding, N., Bingler, J., Kraus, M., & Leippold, M. (2024). Bridging the gap in ESG measurement: Using NLP to quantify environmental, social, and governance communication. Finance Research Letters, 61, 104979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104979

Seow, R. Y. C. (2025). Transforming ESG analytics with machine learning: A systematic literature review using the TCCM framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 7358–7389. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70089

Singh, M., Kumar, A., Nafis, N., & Mishra, M. (2024). Measuring sustainability intention of ESG fund disclosure using few-shot learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.06893

Sneideriene, A., & Legenzova, R. (2025). Greenwashing prevention in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures: A bibliometric analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 74, 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102720

Wu, Q., Xu, M., Yu,Y., Liu, Z., Wong, A., Liu, T., Cao, M., Chua, K., Ng, B., & Cambria, E. (2024). SusGen-GPT: A data-centric LLM for financial NLP and sustainability report generation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.10906

Yang, J., Niu, Y., Shi, W., & Zhu, K. (2025). Predicting ESG disclosure quality through board secretaries’ characteristics: A machine learning approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 76, 102865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102865

Yin, H., Yin, X., & Wen, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence and climate risk: A double machine learning approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103, 104169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104169

Zeng, F., Wang, J., & Zeng, C. (2025). An optimized machine learning framework for predicting and interpreting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior. PLOS ONE, 20(3), e0316287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316287

Zhang, M., Shen, Q., Zhao, Z., Wang, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2025). Optimizing ESG reporting: Innovating with E-BERT models in natural language processing. Expert Systems with Applications, 265, 125931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125931

Zou, Y., Shi, M., Chen, Z., Deng, Z., Lei, Z., Zeng, Z., Yang, S., Tong, H., Xiao, L., & Zhou, W. (2025). ESGReveal: An LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 489, 144572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144572

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.