Palavras-chave
Digitalização
Direitos humanos
Responsabilidade jurídica
Como Citar
Resumo
Objetivo: Este estudo analisa o estado atual da regulamentação da IA na Ucrânia, identifica lacunas regulatórias sistémicas e propõe orientações para melhorar os mecanismos jurídicos e os modelos de responsabilidade.
Metodologia: A pesquisa aplica uma análise jurídica sistemática utilizando análise jurídica comparativa, análise de conteúdo de atos regulatórios, análise estrutural-funcional, interpretação normativa da literatura científica.
Originalidade: O artigo oferece uma visão integrada da regulamentação da IA através da dimensão da soberania digital, mostrando como a Ucrânia deve elaborar a regulamentação da IA na intersecção entre as prioridades nacionais e a convergência internacional.
Principais conclusões: A atual regulamentação ucraniana em matéria de IA continua fragmentada, limitando-se principalmente à propriedade intelectual e às normas gerais de responsabilidade civil. Os aspetos éticos, a transparência, a responsabilização e a atribuição abrangente de responsabilidades continuam insuficientemente codificados. Os modelos internacionais oferecem modelos aplicáveis para a harmonização e institucionalização baseadas no risco.
Contribuições teóricas: O estudo formula uma abordagem conceitual para integrar a doutrina clássica da responsabilidade jurídica nos contextos da IA e propõe fundamentos metodológicos para o desenvolvimento de normas éticas ucranianas, regulamentação baseada no risco e mecanismos institucionais que garantam uma interação equilibrada entre inovação, direitos humanos e supervisão regulatória estatal.
Referências
Alguliyev, R.M. & Mahmudov, R.S. (2024). About some socio-economic problems and risks of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 12(5), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20241205.11
Bakiner, O. (2023). The promises and challenges of addressing artificial intelligence with human rights. Big Data & Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231205476
Bielov, D., Aristova, I., & Hromovchuk, M. (2019). The history of the paradigm of constitutionalism at the present stage of development of the post-Soviet states (on the example of Ukraine). Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis, 16, 265–273.
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2020). Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1556 “On approval of the concept for the development of artificial intelligence in Ukraine”. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-%D1%80#Text
Calderaro, A., & Blumfelde, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and EU security: The false promise of digital sovereignty. European Security, 31(3), 415-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101885
Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), article number 20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080
Committee of Ministers. (2019). Declaration on the manipulative capabilities of algorithmic processes. https://rm.coe.int/090000168092dd4b
De Almeida, P.G.R., dos Santos, C.D., & Farias, J.S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence regulation: A framework for governance. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 505-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-z
Ding, R.X., Palomares, I., Wang, X., Yang, G.R., Liu, B., Dong, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2020). Large-scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an artificial intelligence and applications perspective. Information Fusion, 59, 84-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.006
European Commission for the efficiency of justice. (2021). 2022 – 2025 CEPEJ Action plan: “Digitalisation for a better justice”. https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-12-en-cepej-action-plan-2022-2025-digitalisation-justice/1680a4cf2c
European Commission. (2021). Europe fit for the digital age: Commission proposes new rules and actions for excellence and trust in artificial intelligence. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1682
European Parliament & Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689
European Parliament. (2017). European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2018_252_R_0026
Felzmann, H., Villaronga, E.F., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2019). Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719860542
Gorian, E., & Osman, N.D. (2024). Digital ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.798
Government of the United Kingdom. (2023). The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-summit-2023-the-bletchley-declaration/the-bletchley-declaration-by-countries-attending-the-ai-safety-summit-1-2-november-2023
Harust, Yu.V., Melnyk, V.I., Mirgorod-Karpova, V.V., Pavlenko, B.O., Kiyashko, Yu.M., & Maletov, D.V. (2021). Functioning of the system of evaluation of efficiency of international technical assistance: Experience of the European Union and leading countries. Legal Horizons, 26(39), 117-124. http://www.doi.org/10.21272/legalhorizons.2021.i26.p
Huang, C., Cai, H., Xu, L., Xu, B., Gu, Y., & Jiang, L. (2019). Data-driven ontology generation and evolution towards intelligent service in manufacturing systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.05.075
Jackson, B.W. (2019). Artifcial Intelligence and the fog of innovation: A deep-dive on governance and the liability of autonomous systems. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 35(4), 30-35.
Jungherr, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and democracy: A conceptual framework. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186353
Karpenko, Y.V. (2019). Ethical principles of artificial intellectual application in public administration. National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. Information Technology, 4, 93-97.
Kingston, J.K.C. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and legal liability. In M. Bramer, & M. Petridis (Eds.) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII (pp. 269-279). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47175-4_20
Kostenko, O.M., Bieliakov, K.I., Tykhomyrov, O.O., & Aristova, I.V. (2024). “Legal personality” of artificial intelligence: methodological problems of scientific reasoning by Ukrainian and EU experts. AI and Society, 39(4), 1683–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01641-0
Kovalenko, Y., & Voynov, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and human rights: Guidelines and limitations in the context of national security and defence. Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union. https://www.helsinki.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Preview_AI_human_right_A4-1.pdf
Kryshtanovych, M., Akimova, L., Shamrayeva, V., Karpa, M., & Akimov, O. (2022). Problems of European integration in the construction of EU security policy in the context of counter-terrorism. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 12(4), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.120411
Mahapatra, S. (2025). Ethical governance of AI and the prevention of digital authoritarianism in South and Southeast Asia. Retrieved from https://epub.sub.uni-hamburg.de/epub/volltexte/2025/186102/pdf/DigiTraL_2025_03_Mahapatra.pdf
Muravska, Y., & Slipchenko, T. (2024). Legal regulation of artificial intelligence in Ukraine and the world. Actual Problems of Jurisprudence, 1, 188-195.
Nanni, R., Bizzaro, P. G., & Napolitano, M. (2024). The false promise of individual digital sovereignty in Europe: Comparing artificial intelligence and data regulations in China and the European Union. Policy & Internet, 16(4), 711-726.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). AI principles. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html#:~:text=The%20OECD%20AI%20Principles%20promote,stand%20the%20test%20of%20time
Ortina, G., Zayats, D., Akimova, L., Akimov, O., & Karpa, M. (2023). Economic efficiency of public administration in the field of digital development. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 68(3), 1543-1553. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2023.21
Rajkishore, M., & Gour Chandra, M. (2025). Implementations of AI technology and profit-sharing contract for sustainability development and customer experience improvement: A differential game approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126920
Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
Roberts, H., Hine, E., & Floridi, L. (2023). Digital sovereignty, digital expansionism, and the prospects for global AI Governance. In M. Timoteo, B. Verri, & R. Nanni (Eds.), Quo Vadis, Sovereignty? New Conceptual and Regulatory Boundaries in the Age of Digital China (pp. 51-75). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F., & Teubner, T. (2020). Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(4), 260-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1819094
Shcherbak, S.V., Ivanii, O.M., & Sibilyov, D.M. (2023). Recoverer-oriented enforcement process: Using technology to its fullest potential. Journal of International Legal Communication, 11(4), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2023.11.4.pp.44-54
Shulga, V., Korchenko, O., & Mostenska, T. (2024). Political challenges of science today. Abstracts of XX International conference of higher education students and young scientists (pp. 2024–286). National Aviation University.
Tokarieva, K. & Savliva, N. (2021). Peculiarities of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in Ukraine. Scientific Works of Kyiv Aviation Institute, 3(60), 148–153.
Ulnicane, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the European Union: Policy, ethics and regulation. In Th. Hoerber, G. Weber, & I. Cabras (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of European integrations (pp. 254- 269). Taylor & Francis.
United Nations. (2005). United Nations Convention on the use of electronic communications in International Contracts. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/conventions/electronic_communications
United Nations. (2024). Covering AI for humanity. AI Advisor Body.
Varynskyi, V., Donnikova, I., & Savinova, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Tool, object, ‘subject’ of learning. Journal of International Legal Communication, 10(3), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2023.10.3.pp.46-55
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2023). Law of Ukraine No. 2811-IX “On copyright and related rights”. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2811-20#Text
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2025). Draft Law “On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Advertising” and Other Laws of Ukraine”. https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billinfo/Bills/Card/45290
Wang, Z. (2025). Generative AI‐making and state‐making: Sovereign AI race and the future of digital geopolitics. Politics and Governance, 13, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10222
Yesennikov, K. (2024). Implementation of artificial intelligence in public administration: A comparative analysis of EU and US' experience. Investments: Practice and Experience, 19, 194-199.
Zayed, N.M., Edeh, F.O., Darwish, S., Islam, K.M.A., Kryshtal, H., Nitsenko, V., & Stanislavyk, O. (2022). Human resource skill adjustment in service sector: Predicting dynamic capability in post COVID-19 work environment. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(9), article number 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15090402
Zhang, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 23, article number 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100224
Zhornokui, V.H. (2024). Legal liability: seven doctrinal approaches to understanding its essence. Law and Safety, 92(1), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2024.1.08
Zuwanda, Z.S., Lubis, A.F., Solapari, N., Sakmaf, M.S., & Triyantoro, A. (2024). Ethical and legal analysis of artificial intelligence systems in law enforcement with a study of potential human rights violations in Indonesia. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 2(03), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v2i03.283
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Inteligência Competitiva