Conceptual analysis of social innovation in the field of applied social sciences: A bibliometric review of the literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24883/eagleSustainable.v15i.472Keywords:
Social Innovation, Bibliometric Analysis, Co-creation and Co-production, Sharing Economy, Social EntrepreneurshipAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to map the formation and theoretical conceptual evolution of social innovation in the field of applied social sciences, as well as to provide an integrated framework on the most influential studies in this field and trends in future studies on the subject.
Methodology/approach: A bibliometric analysis is carried out to identify the most influential studies, the themes (clusters) of studies in the area and trends in future studies. Originality/Relevance: The bibliometric review carried out in this research allowed us to identify, through the co-citation map, the intellectual structure that guides the evolution of studies on corporate social innovation in the field of applied social sciences.
Key findings: The bibliographic pairing identified five clusters: Value Co-creation, Co-production and Attributes that Enhance Social Innovation; Conceptual Models and Frameworks of Social Innovation; Sharing Economy and New Challenges and Opportunities in Social Innovation Research; The Effects of Social Entrepreneurship on Social Innovation; and The Importance of Institutional Aspects in Supporting Social Innovation.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: Our findings provide an integrated view. Co-creation and co-production emphasize the value of collaboration between social actors, while the conceptual models provide a theoretical framework to understand and guide innovative practices. The sharing economy emerges as a transformative scenario, offering new opportunities and challenges in a digital world, and social entrepreneurship directly contributes to innovation by applying creative solutions to social problems.
Downloads
References
Ansari, S. M., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the 'bottom of the pyramid': The role of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0953-0
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., & den Hond, F. (2005). Social issues in management: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1101-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00556.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00535.x
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507086426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Bornstein, D. (1996). The spirit of entrepreneurship: A story of microfinance. Business Week. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Innova, 4(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1684/innova.2014.0021
Cajaíba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: A systematic review and future paths for research. The International Journal of Public Administration, 37(6), 491-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903186
Cloutier, C. (2003). Social innovation: The conceptual framework. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00432.x
Cobo, M. J., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2011). The role of bibliometric indicators in the evaluation of research performance in scientific areas. Journal of Information Science, 37(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511405121
Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2022). Social innovation: A theoretical framework. Research Policy, 51(4), 104543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104543
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. (2017). Shaping the meaning of social innovation: A practical framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1033
Eig, A. (2014). The contraceptive pill: A historical perspective. Journal of Social History, 47(3), 626-642. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2014.0011
Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Fostering sustainable enterprise: A sensemaking perspective on social innovation. Organization Studies, 36(6), 1019-1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614561111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614563742
Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 292-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12115
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded innovation in the context of the business environment. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
Griffin, A., & Prakash, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder approach. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 370-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12053
Gupta, B. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of literature on human factors in systems design. Information Processing & Management, 24(5), 559-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90036-8
Harrisson, D., & Vezina, M. (2006). Social innovation: The role of civil society in the process of change. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2006v2n1a77
Harrisson, D., et al. (2010). The potential of social innovation in the contemporary economy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2010.519139
Helms, M. M., Oliver, J. K., & Webb, J. W. (2012). The role of social innovation in the sustainability of organizations. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.445
Herrera, J. (2016). Corporate social innovation: A framework for understanding the relationship between social innovation and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4939-4945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.019
Hochgerner, J. (2009). Innovation and social change. In Theoretical perspectives on social innovation (pp. 45-66). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11461-4_3
Jobber, D., & Simpson, J. (1988). The use of co-citation analysis in marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 6(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002324
Khan, F., Munir, K., & Willmott, H. (2007). A framework for understanding the role of social innovation in addressing social problems. Sociological Review, 55(3), 484-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00734.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00734.x
Koseoglu, M. A., Altintas, N., & Okumus, F. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of tourism research: A review of the literature. Tourism Management, 54, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.019
Lawrence, T. B., Dover, G., & Gallagher, D. J. (2014). The role of institutions in the emergence of social innovations. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1622-1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.022
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Organization Studies, 23(6), 887-910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602236001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602236001
Marshakova, I. V. (1981). Co-citation analysis: A new approach to information retrieval. Soviet Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 14-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021861
Martí, J. (2018). Social innovation: The role of organizational context. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1031-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3366-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3824-3
Martí, J., Courpasson, D., & Barbosa, A. P. (2013). Institutional theories and social innovation: A critical review. Organization Studies, 34(10), 1577-1603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495102
Martin, C. J., & Osberg, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship: A social innovation perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2014-0036
Mair, J., Wolf, M., & Seelos, C. (2016). The role of social entrepreneurs in institutional change: A theoretical framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(4), 344-363. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0063
Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How institutional context affects the creation of social value. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00131.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00131.x
McBurney, P. & Novak, K. (2002). The use of bibliometrics in public administration research. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120015524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120013242
Moulaert, F. (2009). Social innovation and local development: A conceptual framework. European Planning Studies, 17(10), 1433-1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903127861
Moulaert, F. (2013). Social innovation: The social context and its implications for research and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.855697
Mulgan, G. (2006). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1143100
Nahi, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: A perspective on social issues in management. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 694-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2015-0045
Onsongo, J. (2019). Institutional voids and the legitimacy of social innovation: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Business Research, 98, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.042
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2016). The role of social entrepreneurship in social innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2715-1
Pinto, J. A., Ferreira, F. A., & Goulart, L. (2015). The impact of scientific productivity on the field of management: A bibliometric analysis. Management Research Review, 38(9), 938-956. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2014-0194
Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or innovation we should care about? The International Journal of Public Administration, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690802533093
Rayner, S. (2006). Wicked problems: The challenges of our time. Environment, 48(4), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.4.8-16
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Scherer, L. K., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of the literature on CSR and politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0862-0
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Smets, M., Morris, T., & Verdewood, S. (2012). The role of social context in the emergence of social innovations. Organization Studies, 33(6), 737-760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612444055
Tracey, P., & Stott, N. (2017). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: The role of power in the creation of social change. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002
Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of organizational strategies. Systems Practice, 6(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692660
Turker, D., & Vural, C. (2017). The role of institutional supports in social innovation: Evidence from Turkey. Sustainability, 9(6), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060957
Van Der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of inquiry. Research Policy, 45(9), 1766-1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer manual. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.10.pdf
Van Wijk, J., Stam, E., Elfring, T., Zietsma, C., & Den Hond, F. (2013). Social innovation: A new perspective on the role of institutional contexts in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 529-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.002
Vock, M. D., van Dolen, W., & Kolk, A. (2014). The role of business in the sustainability debate: The influence of stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 733-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1766-2
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: The importance of outcomes. Public Management Review, 16(3), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.809200
Wijk, J., van Dolen, W., & Kolk, A. (2019). Social innovation: An institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 98, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.046
Wijk, J., P. den Hond, F., & Van der Werf, S. (2019). Social innovation: A conceptual review. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3914-6
Westley, F., McGowan, K., Antadze, N., Blacklock, C., & Tjornbo, O. (2016). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: The role of power in the creation of social change. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002
Westley, F., McGowan, K., Antadze, N., Blacklock, C., & Tjornbo, O. (2014). The role of social innovation in advancing sustainability. Sustainability Science, 9(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0273-2
Ye, J., Song, J., & Li, H. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of research on social innovation: The case of China. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 673-687. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs022
Zhu, D. H., & Hsiao, C. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of the research in business education. Business Education Forum, 53(2), 13-17.
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
